Today, I stumbled upon a house that i am interested in purchasing for investment purposes. So, while at the courthouse looking up the information, I encounter an Affidavit of Heirship, as the next link in the chain of title or in my own words "last recorded occurance for the property". So, I came home and googled the owner's name, and called her.
Apparently, the owner is the sister of the deceased, who passed 3 years ago in February of next year, and after the will was either not found (intestate) or found invalid, a Judge issued the Affidavit of Heirship for the sister. The owner told me the name of the lawyer she hired, after an adopted daughter hired a lawyer, apparently to contest?
I have done a little reading, only enough to be dangerous or either more confused, because, I am sort of under the impression that after a Judge determines the identity of the heirs under state law, that that ruling would be in the probate file as a public record, and is the reason, that the sister is listed as the owner?
So, I guess my question is, in your best guess, what conceivably could be the goal of hiring an attorney by the daughter? Or, is it reasonable to presume this may have something to do with muniment of title. And lastly, is the soon to be three years of any import to all of the above, or is there no right to an expeditious trial in civil matters, such as the above?
Sorry, if this isn't crystal clear, but i don't know how else to ask.
