Welcome
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

Fannie Mae Announces Single National Down Payment Policy;

Discuss our favorite rules here

Moderators: Otis, DB

Fannie Mae Announces Single National Down Payment Policy;

Postby Otis on Fri May 16, 2008 11:40 pm

http://www.fanniemae.com/newsreleases/2 ... s+Releases
Fannie Mae Announces Single National Down Payment Policy;
Replaces Policy Regarding Markets Where Home Prices are Declining


WASHINGTON, DC -- Fannie Mae (FNM/NYSE) today announced a new, national policy on down payment requirements for conventional, conforming mortgages the company will purchase or guarantee. Starting June 1, 2008, Fannie Mae will accept up to 97 percent loan-to-value ratios for conventional, conforming mortgages processed through its Desktop Underwriter® (DU®) automated underwriting system, and 95 percent loan-to-value ratios for loans underwritten outside of DU, in all geographic locations in the United States. The new national down payment policy will supersede the policy the company adopted in December 2007 that required higher down payments in markets where home prices are declining.

"As another part of our 'Keys to Recovery(TM)' initiative, we are today announcing that we will be equalizing the down payment requirements for borrowers in all parts of the country, regardless of local market conditions," Marianne Sullivan, Senior Vice President, Single-Family Credit Policy and Risk Management, said. "This new down payment policy reinforces our goal to support successful home-owning, not just home-buying, as we seek to bring liquidity to all communities and help the housing market recover."

The new national down payment requirements of 3 or 5 percent will apply to loans for purchase of single-family, primary residences. Down payment requirements will vary for other occupancy, property and transaction types. The company will implement systems and operational changes over the summer to accommodate the new national policy.

"We are able to adopt this new, national down payment requirement, even in markets where home prices are declining, because our new automated underwriting risk assessment model DU Version 7.0 will limit risk layering and assess each loan more precisely," Sullivan added. "At the same time, we believe that equity matters, especially in this market. Down payments are a critical success factor in homeownership -- and responsible lending is good business."

Since the housing correction began, Fannie Mae has expanded its mortgage guaranty business to serve the market's urgent need for stability, liquidity and affordability. The company also undertook steps to help protect borrowers, manage the increased credit risk in the market, and fortify the company's capital position. Among these steps, the company has continued to assess and establish new pricing, eligibility and underwriting criteria for its business that more accurately reflect the current risks in the housing market and guard against the potential for foreclosure. These changes have been incorporated into DU and have included adjustments to credit risk assessment, loan-to-value ratios and down payment requirements, among other factors.

Among the changes in response to market conditions, in December 2007 Fannie Mae adopted a "Maximum Financing in Declining Markets Policy" that restricted the loan-to-value ratios on properties in markets where home prices are declining, essentially requiring higher down payments in these markets. The new single national down payment policy announced today will supersede that policy.

Fannie Mae Senior Vice President Jeff Hayward stressed the company's commitment to special affordable lending programs to support homeownership for families of modest means. "We are stepping up to provide more liquidity and affordability to some of the most distressed communities while also seeking at least a 3 percent down payment investment through our Desktop Underwriter system from borrowers to help ensure their success."

Fannie Mae will continue to provide support for homebuyers that need down payment assistance, and will continue to allow loans with Community Seconds® up to a maximum 105 percent combined loan-to-value ratio. Community Seconds allow a borrower to obtain a second-lien mortgage to help cover down payment and closing costs, with funding typically provided by a state or local housing agency; an employer; or a nonprofit organization. Fannie Mae also offers MyCommunityMortgage® and Flex mortgage products, which permit down payment assistance programs in the form of gifts and grants.

"We recognize that down payment assistance programs remain a viable tool for borrowers who can afford a mortgage long term, but might need a little help getting started," Sullivan said.

As part of its "Keys to Recovery" initiative, Fannie Mae is expanding its partnership with the National Council of State Housing Agencies. The company will provide up to $10 billion in financing to help Housing Finance Authorities (HFA) serve first-time homebuyers of modest means. In some cases, Fannie Mae will purchase HFA mortgages that have greater than 97 percent loan-to-value ratios.

The first "Keys to Recovery" initiative that Fannie Mae announced on May 6, 2008 also includes: streamlined refinancing for Fannie Mae borrowers whose mortgage balances exceed the value of their homes; improved pricing for jumbo-conforming mortgages to help borrowers in high-cost areas; and a neighborhood stabilization initiative with the Center for Community Self-Help for targeted areas with high home foreclosures.
Don't believe everything you think ;)

What are they SMOKING?
<<Link
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby Steve Owen on Sat May 17, 2008 10:30 am

Here's another link to the same story.

http://appraisalnewsonline.typepad.com/ ... .html#more

Three percent down, huh? Guess I'd better tell my worthless cousin it's time to buy a house.

Interesting dilemma Fannie finds herself in.

In the good old days, if you didn't have ten percent to put down you probably were not going to be buying a house. There was still some room for fraud and abuse, but if the collateral was valued right, the ten percent requirement (along with the no house payment above 35 percent of net income requirement) was a heavy inducement to carefully evaluate what you, as a homeowner, were getting into.

Then came the go-go days of heavy hitting speculators and rapid price appreciation. Don't worry... inflation will cover it.

Funny thing is, though. It looks like the only way out for Fannie is more of the same. Kind of makes you wonder if the housing market in some areas is much more than a giant Ponzi scheme.
I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
Steve Owen
Certified General
 
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Joplin, Missouri

Postby benluby on Sun May 18, 2008 9:32 am

They need to implement a fee panel system again, specifically for these properties, and ban ARM's from being the basis of the loan, but rather fixed rates.
I am not completely against these types of programs, as they can, and do help people get into houses, but I am against putting people in loans they cannot afford to begin with.
Whoever thinks herding cats is impossible, has never walked with an open can of Tuna.
User avatar
benluby
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:41 pm

Postby Edd Gillespie on Sun May 18, 2008 9:57 am

So what is a desktop underwriting? And why is it worth 2%.
Edd “In the real estate economy, there are no guarantees that reason will prevail in a market where emotions run high and the amount of misinformation runs deep.” Jonathan Miller in The Matrix. So what’s an appraiser to do?
Edd Gillespie
Certified General
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:23 pm

Postby Edd Gillespie on Sun May 18, 2008 10:10 am

Steve Owen wrote:In the good old days, if you didn't have ten percent to put down you probably were not going to be buying a house. There was still some room for fraud and abuse, but if the collateral was valued right, the ten percent requirement (along with the no house payment above 35 percent of net income requirement) was a heavy inducement to carefully evaluate what you, as a homeowner, were getting into.


So did that work well? If so for whom and how long? Did the one size fits all encourage housing for all or leave the banks in charge? Why did Fannie change from 10% to 5 and 3? Is there any stats to prove that down payments dramatically influence foreclosure rates?

Intuitively it seems to make sense to require a dog in the fight, but if everybody in the middle is going to defraud everybody else I doubt that anything short of a 100% down payment will work.
Edd “In the real estate economy, there are no guarantees that reason will prevail in a market where emotions run high and the amount of misinformation runs deep.” Jonathan Miller in The Matrix. So what’s an appraiser to do?
Edd Gillespie
Certified General
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:23 pm

Postby Mentor on Sun May 18, 2008 1:50 pm

There was 5% down conventional financing available way back in 1973. Been there. MGIC was the main mortgage insurer. With this declining markets BS, the GSE's went too far with CLTV cut backs. Heck, the market is already down, so pound it down further? Shoot the existing portfolio in the foot? They must have figured out what they were doing to themselves or somehow got the regulators to bug off on that stuff.

Good for Fannie management! I'm all for a Fannie/Freddie mortgage market surge (advance back to pre-zero down days and sound UW), and I don't want them to make an orderly withdrawal from lending. :lol:

I have this view since we are stuck with the GSE paradigm for the near term future. In a less imperfect world there would be a more level playing field, where investors had no semi-safe GSE haven (govt might bail me out choice). Notice how the wall street firms closed up shop and/or made changes first? Fannie/Freddie market share goes from +/-40% to +/-70% in a year or two?

That should tell you something about how govt sponsorship/affiliation/ability to borrow from the Fed distorts market signals and prolongs the day of reckoning. Government tinkering with accounting rules, with the S& L mandate, lots of things delayed the day of reckoning during the '80's and compounded the losses, much like today. :lol:
I'll take questions on 203K Renovation Loans and FHA Reverse Mortgages
User avatar
Mentor
Certified General
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:56 pm


Return to USPAP, Fannie, and Freddie

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests