(bold mine)Julianne Clark, made application to upgrade from a registered trainee to a certified residential appraiser. Mr. Flowers was the reviewer and stated there was a problem with her reports. He stated that although the applicant appeared knowledgeable about the appraisals, Ms. Clark had not signed the appraisal reports nor was there a certification that she contributed significant appraisal assistance. Ms. Clark stated that her supervisor would not let her sign the reports or put her name on them. She stated she was told that by signing the supervising appraiser affidavit and her experience log her supervisor had given sufficient evidence of her work on these reports. Mr. Pipkin had recommended approval for her experience pending a notarized letter from her supervisor outlining the appraisals that Ms. Clark had completed, but withdrew this recommendation when it was stated by staff that this may not be an acceptable situation for experience credit by the Appraiser Qualification Board (AQB) and the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC). Ms. Urban recommended verifying acceptability with the AQB and the ASC prior to approval for Ms. Clark. Dr. Evans made a motion to reconsider the above vote due to legal considerations, but withdrew the recommendation after further discussion. The matter was left for a future meeting after staff and legal counsel could determine if the experience could be considered acceptable. Mr. Wade made the motion to open a complaint against the supervising appraiser and Mr. Headden seconded the motion. The motion carried unopposed.
This really shines. These guys are busting their butts to try to help a trainee get certified, in spite of a huge complaint work load. And on top of that, they're going to field-dress that supervisor. I'm getting really proud of our board.
