 |
Appraisers' Free Forum Hosted by freeforums.org
|
| Welcome |
|
|
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Do you favor requiring tests for CE credit? |
| Yes |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
| No |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jay Trotta Member
Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 812 Location: Snowglobe
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1st off I'm in total agreement with Edd
If and When someone can decide to introduce new and rewarding class material CEU's are a waste, haven't taken a class of different total material in over 20 years. It's repeted way to often and there isn't sufficient changes in material to warrant the demand for CEU's in the short amount of time required. The States take advantage of the requirement only to capture "pork barrel" excess, ifn anyone can find out where all those funds go.......
Testing......haaa, just because you can pass a Test, doesn't mean you actually know any more - some folk are good Testers, others may strugle but have a greater knowledge overall - how would a Test note the difference
It's almost like saying AVM's provide quality information 100% of the time
There may be so many quality "Test Takers", that working against the rules of mankind has left it's mark, worldwide
The number of college gradjiates will soon reach the number of active attorneys, after all aren't we really Purchasing the sheepskin Does anyone know the number of College flunkies, Senior year  _________________ As President Ford said, "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted "no." But, that does not mean that I am entirely against the idea... just that I would need to add some qualifiers in order to vote "yes." In other words, I am against testing for CE credit under the current paradigm.
What I would support is allowing a wider variety of classwork to qualify for CE. So, for example, an appraiser who feels weak on business communication or writing, should be able to make an improvement by taking coursework on that subject an applying it to CE. Of course, that will never happen under the present regime... the state boards are too closely linked with CE providers.
Much of the CE being offered today is just plain garbage. Not only is the information useless... a lot of it is not even correct! I have had to suffer through numerous courses where the instructor knew less than myself. I have had to suffer through other courses where the instructor had little or no field experience and on more than a few occasions was teaching because of the inability to do. Even when I have found good instructors (and there are many) the individual bias of that person's experience often translates to the classroom.
CE is nothing more than a necessary evil. Testing for it would add insult to injury. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jrs at OBX Certified Residential

Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 152 Location: Kill Devil Hills, NC
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Corporate Lackey wrote: | | When I take a course/seminar/class, whatever, I want to freaking LEARN something!!!!! When I have taught, it seems that only a minority are actually there to learn, or even want to learn as part of obtaining some hours on their rear. |
I agree. The last USPAP class I took discussed USPAP for less than an hour. I wouldn't have too much of a problem if I was just picking a class to get my required hours. I've even taken a couple of CE classes that I knew wouldn't have much substance. When I take a USPAP class I expect to learn USPAP. IT'S FREEKING IMPORTANT FOR ME TO LEARN USPAP IN MY USPAP UPDATE CLASS!!!!
If tests were required, some of the teachers would be forced to stay on topic. The sad thing is that my CE choices are limited without travel and an overnight hotel stay. _________________ I bet you do gamble!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
 Community Chest
|