 |
Appraisers' Free Forum Hosted by freeforums.org
|
| Welcome |
|
|
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Goodpasture Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 937 Location: Pawnee Nation
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: Appraising Green |
|
|
I am thinking about doing research on green appraising. As more and more conservation/alternate energy issues come up and as more and more "fixes" to those issues are created, green responses are going to be part of market value. If you were going to evaluate a "green" feature, how would you approach it?
Apparently the Green Building Standards have points that are awarded for elements of "green" and a building can achieve one of four "awards:" Bronze, Silver, Gold and Emerald.
From the Standards draft:
| Quote: | 303.2 Green Buildings. The threshold points required for the environmental performance levels for a green building shall be in accordance with Table 303.2. To qualify for one of these performance levels, all of the following shall be satisfied:
(1) The threshold number of points, in accordance with Table 303.2, shall be achieved as prescribed in Categories 1 through 6. The lowest level achieved in any category shall be determine the overall performance level achieved for the building.
(2) In addition to the threshold number of points in each category, all mandatory provisions of each category shall be implemented.
(3) In addition to Section 701, either Section 702 (the Performance Analysis) or Section 703 (the Prescriptive Method) shall be used to establish the threshold Performance Level under Category 3 (Energy Efficiency).
(4) In addition to the threshold number of points prescribed in Categories 1 through 6, 100 points from Category 7 shall be achieved from any of the Categories. Where deemed appropriate by the adopting entity, s additional points (Category 7) may be assigned to another category (or categories) to increase the threshold points required for that category (or categories). Points shall not be reduced by the adopting entity in any of the seven other categories.
|
The reason I asked, is that I downloaded the NAHB Green Building Standards draft the other day, and I had an appraiser in class on Friday that was inquiring about a class on Appraising Green........... so I thought I would explore the topic......anyone got any input? _________________
You should wake up with a smile on your face.....that way you can get it over with early before you have to deal with the world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhonda Brown Certified Residential

Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 733 Location: Jackson, Mississippi
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: Re: Appraising Green |
|
|
| Goodpasture wrote: | | If you were going to evaluate a "green" feature, how would you approach it? |
I approach it by looking at the market for it. Remember always that cost does not necessarily equal value. Just because someone paid to put something up does not mean that the new owner will want it or be willing to pay extra for it.
Point in fact. I am appraising a house that used to have solar panels for generating electricity. The new owner bought the house, fixed it up, and is flipping it. I am appraising it for him for basis in determination of an asking price.
When I got there, there were no solar panels. "We took them down." he said. "But, it was not necessary to re-roof."
Would they have added value? I really don't know for sure, but I kind of doubt it.
Interesting side note. While looking for comps I found one very much like my subject that sold with solar panels on it. When I went to take my pic, the solar panels were gone and the house was getting a new roof.
Best guess: This particular feature is desired by certain individuals, but adds nothing to market value.
Fortunately, I have not actually had to appraise one that has active solar panels on it, which is why the above statement is a guess only.
Other features:
Six inch walls... seem to have some attractiveness in the market. Do not seem to return the same value as their cost.
Wind mills... I've seen a couple, but never saw one sell.
Insul-roof... This stuff does actually seem to return some value for commercial buildings. I suspect that the leakproof properties trump the energy saving properties.
Berm houses... don't get me started. These things always have functional obsolescence. I charge a lot extra to appraise one.
Ground-source heat pumps... fifteen years ago they were going to save the world. Today I rarely see a new installation.
Other "green" construction, such as straw bale or rammed earth may become viable. But, for right now, I'm guessing that most people will put their money in thermal pane windows and a bit more insulation. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goodpasture Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 937 Location: Pawnee Nation
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is adherence to traditional principles more important than developing an accurate estimate of value?
Can you, for example, look at the utility costs of operating a property and do a comparison between the energy savings between the green and the conventional?
On occasion we get houses that have no gas bills. For pipeline easements, or as part of ground rent they get free natural gas. This represents a substantial savings in energy costs and should certainly be reflected in the value of the house. Identical properties where the savings in the cost of energy equals 10% of the monthly payment would make that property worth something........how much it is worth is what we are talking about. As time goes on and the cost of energy continues to rise and the effects of global warming become more apparent, reducing the carbon footprint is going to become a major concern.
Lets say a solar heating panel saves you $25 a month for the months of October through March. That is $125 a year. If the life expectancy of that solar panel is 10 years, you have a lifetime savings of $1,250. What is the present value of that $1,250? If you have 10 or 12 items that generate similar savings, you have a very real contribution to value. Particularly in a time where the cost of a BTU doubles every year.
Saying it is not market driven or that there is no paired sales to develop a value seems a bit short sighted. Simply because MLS does not have a searchable field for such things, does not mean there is no influence in value. _________________
You should wake up with a smile on your face.....that way you can get it over with early before you have to deal with the world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Goodpasture wrote: | | Lets say a solar heating panel saves you $25 a month for the months of October through March. That is $125 a year. If the life expectancy of that solar panel is 10 years, you have a lifetime savings of $1,250. What is the present value of that $1,250? If you have 10 or 12 items that generate similar savings, you have a very real contribution to value. Particularly in a time where the cost of a BTU doubles every year. |
There is nothing wrong with including the green savings within the income approach... especially for commercial properties. However, most examples I have seen have done it wrong. They are biased because they consider only the savings and don't consider the additional costs. These costs are not always economically obvious.
For example, in the paragraph above, you missed two obvious things. First, the hassle factor. I have a friend who lives down on Bryant Creek in Southern Ozark County, Missouri. She has solar electric panels primarily because her power grid supply is not very reliable. Your costs above do not include annual maintenance... and, I can tell you, based on her experience, it is considerable. In addition to relatively frequent calls by her "solar guy," she has to clear the snow and ice in the winter and trim the trees that would block the devices in the summer. She loves her solar cells, but freely admits they are a major hassle.
The second fallacy, might be the "assumption" that they are going to last ten years.
Additionally, you miss something that is not economically obvious, but which the market seems to have noticed... the "view." People who are perfectly willing to have a satellite dish mounted on their roof seem to think that the appearance of solar panels will detract from their home's appearance. (I didn't say it had to be logical.) Solar panels are kind of like a Libertarian sign in the front yard... a lot of people might like the idea, but don't want to put it up because they don't want their neighbors to think they're nuts.
"Lets say a solar heating panel saves you $25 a month for the months of October through March." How do you say that? What is it based upon? But, okay... lets say it does, and lets say that your house was valued at $300,000 before the solar panel was installed. The $1,250 is 0.004 percent of value even without discounting. Hardly worth crowing about. I've known appraisers who adjusted for garage door openers, too. Hardly makes sense, though... we are surely hitting it with a large enough hammer to miss things larger than that.
What I was saying, Greg, is not that I can't find paired sales (although it is true that you would have to do an extensive search to find any... and might come up empty.) What I was saying was that I saw two examples, just within the last week, where houses sold with solar on them, only to have the new owners remove it and throw it away. That sounds like pretty strong evidence that a large segment of the market thinks it isn't worth the trouble.
This stuff may well come into its own. In 1954 my Grandfather built a house and put six inches of insulation in it. One of the VP's of Empire District Electric Company, who was a family friend told him that was too much insulation to be cost effective and it would never pay for itself. Of course, we all know what happened... today, more than six inches is the norm. However, if we had been appraising that house in 1954, we would not have been able to give it a higher market value for the extra insulation.
What I suspect will happen is something similar to the insulation story. Nowdays, more and more people are putting in tankless water heaters. Someday, there will be enough people in the market who have experience with them and prefer them that if a house goes on the market without one it will be a negative selling point. Just like it would now be a negative selling point today if a house had less than six inches of insulation. However, in the meantime, I would be very, very careful about imputing value from "green" construction without market evidence. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Greg, I was just in the Shawnee Wal-Mart Neighborhood Grocery a while ago. What I saw was kind of interesting and on this topic. I don't know if it has always been this way in this store or if it's a retrofit, but I had not noticed it before.
The frozen foods area has typical looking upright cases with glass windows. However, when I walked down that aisle, I was the only one there. I noticed that the lights in each case were lighting up as I walked past. Now, this would not be very efficient if they were fluorescent. There was a famous study by the Air Force about Thirty-five years ago, where they concluded that it was cheaper to leave all the lights on all the time rather than to have people coming in and out turning them off and on.
Anyway, the cases appear to be lighted by some time of LED and there is a small sensor on each door, near the top, that looks like a body heat sensor. I believe we are going to see a lot of innovations to save energy. I don't know how much it will affect appraising the property, though.
A few years ago, one of the questions was how handicap accessibility affected property value. The simple answer is to compare an accessible property to another accessible property and then you don't have to worry too much about it. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now here is something that would definitely have to be considered by any commercial appraiser.
http://www.joplinglobe.com/editorial/local_story_182205925.html
If this becomes law, then there is a quantifiable advantage... lower taxes. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some more info...
http://www.enn.com/pollution/article/37518
Obviously, some places are different than others... know your market.
However, what do you want to bet that some buyers of new homes will disconnect them and install something else? _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goodpasture Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 937 Location: Pawnee Nation
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frankly I expect them to continue to be a force to consider. There are too many laws and incentives that have been enacted to ignore. I think the failure of an appraiser to look seriously at the contribution being green makes is going to come back and bite him sooner than later. I also think making more out of it than is warranted is a problem. We are going to have to establish some pretty solid methodology to determine contribution.
One of the articles mentioned a couple that moved their $40,000 system from California to Florida........so many questions about that. did the market not reflect any value for such hardware or did the falling prices in California make the contribution suspect? Was it cheaper to move the hardware than replace it? Was the contributory value less than the cost of moving it? Maybe the system was just not available in Florida. Be nice to interview the people just to see what their reasoning was.
But the fact that a state is passing laws requiring solar water heat is interesting. At what point will that concept end? How about off grid systems for electricity? Can that be mandated in the face of big energy? or will big energy jump on the bandwagon?
But our job is to determine actual value.....and I agree the income and cost are the sole indicators of value out there, but in using those, we can we can start establishing parameters of utility and value.
Like any new technology, cost and ROI have to be the measure. How would you consider the contribution of a unique feature that has cost, and some sort of appeal, but where there is NO paired sales? I would think a depreciated cost and an ROI would peg it pretty closely.
Thanks for the links, btw, _________________
You should wake up with a smile on your face.....that way you can get it over with early before you have to deal with the world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tel Certified Residential

Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 507 Location: NE Ohio
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just rambling here with some disjointed thoughts. So please consider them in that light.
1. 5 houses in a neighborhood have green stuff. One cost $5K to add the green stuff, another 10K, another 15K, another 20K, and the last 40K. If you assume that the savings generated will be paid back over the next 20 years on each of the houses....it is only fair to state the significant differences. Just how are you going to find this cost/savings data? In my area there is minimal if any 'green' info in the MLS or country records.
2. Defining the 'differences' in the greening of a house is absolutly critical to the adjustment grid.
3. Are the homebuyers capable of determine the 'value' of a green system? Or do they buy the house because it has fresh paint & granite counters.
4. If you can not dig out the specifics of the 'greening' I don't see how you can make adjustments.
5. A house around the corner from me put in a geothermal system when the house was underconstruction. They could not heat and cool the house properly. Apparently the installer drastically undersized the amount of underground lines needed. How much is this 'greening' worth?
6. Will the 'high tech' type of greening drive away the typical buyer, because they do not grasp how the complex system & batteries, etc. work?
7. What about the cost & frequency of maintenance of the green system, will it have a bearing on the 'greening' contribution to value.
8. What is the life expectancy of the green system?
Me thinks there has to be a lot more of these 'green' homes out there before it is something appraisers can consider with any sense of accuracy. _________________ Don't be a 2 bit appraiser or soon we will all be 1 bit appraisers. 4 bits or bust.
Last edited by tel on Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goodpasture Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 937 Location: Pawnee Nation
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks to me like we need a course, first, in just what constitutes "greeg."
In looking for a textbook, I came across this one:
Green from the Ground Up
| Quote: | Green construction is the building trend of the decade and being demanded by more and more home buyers in search of sustainable, healthy and energy-efficient homes.
High energy costs are increasing the demand for Green, Energy Efficient Building.
You’ll learn how to apply the most forward-thinking and proven methods of green construction to the homes you build or remodel. All contractors need to know this information and be able to offer it to their customers.
Green From The Ground Up has details for planning, material selection, energy efficiency and indoor air quality. It details every step in design and construction, from framing to finishes. This is a must-have reference for contractors who want to remain competitive and offer their customers the latest ideas for energy efficiency.
This book is filled with hundreds of clear full-color photos that illustrate every aspect of building green, including:
* foundations
* framing
* roofs and attics
* doors and windows
* plumbing
* HVAC
* electrical
* insulation
* siding and decking
* ventilation
* solar energy
* interior finishes
* landscaping
* and more!
Even includes tips on reducing air leakage and sound transmission.
Green From The Ground Up is a thorough, informative, and up-to-date reference on green, sustainable and energy-efficient home construction. It clarifies definitions of "green" and "sustainable" and guides builders and architects through the process of new or remodel green construction, including issues of site, landscaping, durability, and energy-efficiency.
It starts with clear explanations of the concepts and fundamentals of green, healthy and energy-efficient construction and walks the reader through the entire construction process, injecting expert advice at every decision point.
Construction techniques, materials, and products are thoroughly explained, making the often vaguely understood concepts cleanly understandable.
The book gives builders and architects the tools to respond to growing requests from homeowners for green and energy-efficient houses, whether new or remodeled. Homeowners can use the book to understand the concepts, process, and options, whether they're doing it themselves or working with a professional.
“A refreshing and comprehensive step-by-step course in green building, packed with both solid building science and common sense solutions.”
–Helen English, executive director of Sustainable Buildings Industry Council
“Green From the Ground Up overflows with details and practical content that is hard to find anywhere else…an essential resource for any building professional that will be a valuable reference tool for years to come.”
–Brian Gitt, CEO of Build It Green
“Within 5 to 10 years, all contractors will need to know how to execute a green remodel. From framing and foundations to plumbing and interior finishes, Green From the Ground Up puts that information in our hands.”
–Dan Taddei, director of education, National Association of the Remodeling Industry |
_________________
You should wake up with a smile on your face.....that way you can get it over with early before you have to deal with the world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1935 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Within 5 to 10 years, all contractors will need to know how to execute a green remodel. |
One comment on that. I took a college course called "Basic Solar Design." It was pretty tough for an undergraduate course, including a lot of complex formulas for determining heat flows and even some calculus. When I took the course, I would have sworn that many of these basic design features would be built into every new home within the next few years. That was in about 1978. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tel Certified Residential

Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 507 Location: NE Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scenerio..............
Your subject has a 25 year old furnace (let's say it's an 80% efficiency type) and it still runs great.
You pick similar age, style, and size homes for your comps.
How many of them, if any, have a new 92% or higher efficiency furnace, which will save the owners a lot of bucks. How many of your comps are 'green"?/???? _________________ Don't be a 2 bit appraiser or soon we will all be 1 bit appraisers. 4 bits or bust.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goodpasture Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 937 Location: Pawnee Nation
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve Owen wrote: | | That was in about 1978. |
When I was designing commercial buildings back then, heat loss calculations were a mandatory part of the permit application process. In Oklahoma we had to deal with hydrology due to displacement of water, and in New Mexico we had to deal with water consumption of the landscaping. But in both states we had to calculate thermal transference, but in New Mexico the thermal mass of adobe was always fun. As energy becomes more and more costly those calculations are going to become far more common.
And the cost of energy is going to skyrocket in the very near future. China is building a highway system that rivals Ike's Interstate system. The US, with 5% of the worlds population, uses 95% of the worlds energy production. Both China and India are going to equal our usage over the next decade. Ours won't go down, theirs will go up. _________________
You should wake up with a smile on your face.....that way you can get it over with early before you have to deal with the world
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
 Community Chest
|