Welcome
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

Wise steps by state in sub-prime mess

Discussion of the condition of the general economy. Post links to articles of interest, but do not post copyrighted material which violates fair use.

Moderators: Otis, DB

Wise steps by state in sub-prime mess

Postby Otis on Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:07 am

http://www.mcall.com:80/news/opinion/al ... 7961.story
Developments of the last four days make clear that the extent of damage caused by sub-prime mortgages has yet to be fully measured. The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve are planning unprecedented steps to protect Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, U.S.-backed companies that guarantee almost half of all U.S. mortgages. If Congress approves, the actions proposed by the Bush adminstration will open the door to sizable taxpayer exposure in the widening credit crisis.

That ominous atmosphere makes all the more noteworthy a development in Harrisburg. While the problem is national, most of the pertinent regulating falls to the states. Last week, Gov. Ed Rendell signed five bills into law that address the current sub-prime mortgage crisis. They bring to fruition a process begun over five years ago by Allentown Republican Pat Browne, a state senator who helped to define a wise state response to the sub-prime mess: not a bailout, but better protection in the future.

<snip>

These five bills will be a major legacy of the 2007-08 Legislature. The commonwealth now will require anyone who sells a mortgage, not just officers of traditional banks, to be trained and licensed by the Department of Banking. It reduces lenders' ability to prevent homeowners from refinancing their mortgages. (This restriction is capped at $217,873, which means that lenders may still penalize borrowers for refinancing homes that roughly cost more than the median sale price in the Lehigh Valley.) It empowers the Banking Department to penalize and publicize those who violate these regulations. It broadens the authority of the state appraiser's board to prevent properties from being overvalued as a way to secure a higher mortgage. It increases the fine 10-fold, to $10,000, for any appraiser who engages in fraud. And, finally, it requires all lending institutions to send foreclosure notices to the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Authority, rather than hide these data, so that state economists can assess trends and propose policy in the public interest.

<snip>

Emphasis added
Rut Rohhhhhhhhh :shock:

Suppose that will make a difference? Not unless they enforce it.
Don't believe everything you think ;)

What are they SMOKING?
<<Link
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby Steve Owen on Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:16 am

It empowers the Banking Department to penalize and publicize those who violate these regulations. It broadens the authority of the state appraiser's board to prevent properties from being overvalued as a way to secure a higher mortgage. It increases the fine 10-fold, to $10,000, for any appraiser who engages in fraud. And, finally, it requires all lending institutions to send foreclosure notices to the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Authority, rather than hide these data, so that state economists can assess trends and propose policy in the public interest. (emphasis added)


Three good things. Other states should follow suit in the current situation.

However,

Alan Jennings, executive director of the Community Action Committee of the Lehigh Valley himself ''wish(ed) that the legislative process wasn't so slow.'' But he also noted that more timely regulation, not market forces, would have saved many from the pain of foreclosure.


He completely misses the point that a free market would have prevented much of this mess to start with. We are in this problem specifically because of Fannie and Freddie, the bundling and slicing and dicing of mortgage securities, and the implied (now coming true) government backing of those investments. If mortgages had been made by private investors, with full knowledge that their investments were on the line and no government bailout, and no accounting scalawags in Fannie and Freddie (or, for that matter, no Fannie and Freddie), I'll bet those investors would have been a lot more cautious about who they were lending money to. There is plenty of blame to go around, but this whole problem really belongs firmly upon the doorstep of the Fed an the GSE's.
I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
Steve Owen
Certified General
 
Posts: 2136
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Joplin, Missouri


Return to General Economic News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron