Welcome
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

Confessions of a subprime lender: 3 bad loans

Discussion of the condition of the general economy. Post links to articles of interest, but do not post copyrighted material which violates fair use.

Moderators: Otis, DB

Confessions of a subprime lender: 3 bad loans

Postby Otis on Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:36 am

http://money.cnn.com:80/2008/07/15/real ... e_lending/
<snip>
One of Bitner's last clients, which he says was turning point for him, was Johnny Cutter and his wife Patti, from South Carolina. The deal illustrated what had become the fundamental problem with subprime lending: Nobody was bothering to determine whether borrowers could actually afford to make their payments. And so the Cutters, like millions of others, became a foreclosure waiting to happen.

"What really got to me," said Bitner, "is that we [usually] put people in positions to not fail. This loan didn't fit that."

The Cutters wanted a loan to buy a newly built, 1,800 square-foot house, but had been turned down for a mortgage twice because of bad credit. After that, they scrimped for three years and saved enough for a 5% down payment.

But, they still had only $2,200 in combined net monthly income, poor credit and employment histories, almost zero savings and no history of even paying rent. Their mortgage payment, property taxes and insurance came to $1,500, leaving them just $700 a month for all other expenses.

<snip>

In another highly regrettable deal, Bitner's company was simply scammed.

A criminal crew found a house, bought it for $140,000, and then resold it to a straw buyer for way more than it was worth - $220,000. To get a mortgage, the buyer used an appraisal for an entirely different, and much more valuable, property.

"The broker, buyer, appraiser, and realtor all conspired to perpetrate this fraud," said Bitner. Indeed, just about all the documentation was falsified.

The group collected the $220,000, and, minus their $140,000 outlay, disappeared with $80,000.

Kellner Mortgage wasn't aware of any problem until the investor that bought the loan set about investigating when it went unpaid. The investor sent Kellner a letter detailing the ruse and demanding that Bitner's firm make good on the loan.

Emphasis added
Don't believe everything you think ;)

What are they SMOKING?
<<Link
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3252
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby WM on Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:46 pm

The appraiser was most likely not in the loop.

Guilty of piss poor work, but not aware of the intent to split with $80,000. Smuck probably only got $300 or worse - a 40% split.

20 bucks says the appraiser was a newbie or trainee given an order with $220,000 in bold as the number needed.

Said idiot then proceeded to "get the number" because isn't that what a good appraiser does?
WM
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:39 pm
Location: Florida


Return to General Economic News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests