 |
Appraisers' Free Forum Hosted by freeforums.org
|
| Welcome |
|
|
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jim Plante Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 1577 Location: Selmer, TN
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: No more Fannie/Freedie? |
|
|
I was watching/listening/dozing during Fox Business News this afternoon. Four different financial big-shots offered the opinion that Fannie and Freddie should be broken up into ten different units like the Federal Reserve, and Fannie/Freddie should be dissolved.
Dick Bove said that the debt burden of Fan/Fred equals the national debt, so the government should NOT buy their stock to shore up their prices. Doing so would be an explicit assumption of their debt. He said the best thing that could be done is to dissolve both of them. He even predicted that this time next year, there won't be any Fannie or Freddie. _________________ Jim Plante
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Caudell Licensed/Registered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 127 Location: Abingdon, Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: Re: No more Fannie/Freedie? |
|
|
| Jim Plante wrote: | I was watching/listening/dozing during Fox Business News this afternoon. Four different financial big-shots offered the opinion that Fannie and Freddie should be broken up into ten different units like the Federal Reserve, and Fannie/Freddie should be dissolved.
Dick Bove said that the debt burden of Fan/Fred equals the national debt, so the government should NOT buy their stock to shore up their prices. Doing so would be an explicit assumption of their debt. He said the best thing that could be done is to dissolve both of them. He even predicted that this time next year, there won't be any Fannie or Freddie. |
What would make up the secondary market if this happens? _________________ Bill Caudell
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Plante Certified Residential
Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Posts: 1577 Location: Selmer, TN
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe non-GSE investors, who would probably be more finicky about what they were considering buying.
I've had at least two independent investors in my small rural area to request drive-by appraisals on properties whose notes they were considering buying. They didn't want the occupant to know they were looking at them, so they ordered "no contact, no interior inspection." Since they were both commercial premises open to the public, we made a cursory interior inspection pretending to be potential customers. I don't know the final disposition, but both assignments paid good fees, $1K±.
There's a possibility that the ten Fannie fragments might continue to offer secondary market purchases, but they'd be more tightly regulated, and would function without the government's backing. Since they're smaller, they'd be easier to monitor and control. _________________ Jim Plante
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1919 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:52 pm Post subject: Re: No more Fannie/Freedie? |
|
|
| Bill Caudell wrote: | | What would make up the secondary market if this happens? |
They call it the free market. We used to have one in this country before the New Deal... well, free-er, anyway. _________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Owen Certified General
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1919 Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
No more Fannie/Freddie? Sorry, Jim... it was a dream too good to be true.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/business/24housing.html?th&emc=th
But, there are a few Republicans who are really Republicans left... at least when it gets close to election time...
| Quote: |
Republicans said they would not support a bill that puts taxpayer money at risk while potentially bailing out irresponsible borrowers and greedy lenders. |
_________________ I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
 Community Chest
|