Welcome
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

MARI's Mortgage Fraud & SARS Report to MBA

ASC notices of suspensions and revocations. Please add comments and/or details of what happened here.

Moderators: Otis, DB

MARI's Mortgage Fraud & SARS Report to MBA

Postby Otis on Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:23 am

http://www.mari-inc.com/pdfs/mba/MBA9thCaseRpt.pdf

Table 5 shows some interesting (to me) numbers. During the height of the sub-prime activity, and before the implosions, there was an increasing number of reported appraisal/valuation frauds and then in 2006 there was a decline.
Don't believe everything you think ;)

What are they SMOKING?
<<Link
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3257
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby santa on Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:04 pm

Otis, you have to read too...you can't just look at the pretty pictures :-)

MARI notes, “The low levels of reporting are typically due to the fact that reported incidents involve more than one type of fraud. If a reporting lender finds misrepresentation in, for example, the verification of employment and occupancy status, that lender is not likely to pay for the review appraisal to verify appraisal fraud, even if the appraisal appears to be inflated. But these numbers are likely to increase as the lengthy process of reappraisal and value-verification is completed in many investigations.”
User avatar
santa
Member
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:54 pm

Postby Otis on Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:31 pm

[font=Comic Sans MS]But the pictures are so much better than all that dang reading stuff. :porker: :porker: Thought you knew that already. :whipit: :whipit: I do agree with you that it will produce a lot more indicators once there are retro appraisals, reviews and other factors (all of which should have been done at the beginning!). :Sam: :Sam: [/font]
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3257
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby santa on Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:22 pm

OK....I admit it...I like the pretty pictures too...especially the ones you have to turn sideways to view properly :-)
User avatar
santa
Member
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:54 pm

Postby Annemieke Roell on Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:57 am

I didn't read the article but I have serious issues with the way MARI deals with reports. They do not appear to be looked into and the appraiser does not get a reasonable chance to rebut.
We're not being stopped by something on the outside, but by something on the inside.
User avatar
Annemieke Roell
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 1152
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Postby Edd Gillespie on Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:11 am

I heard a MARI guy at a conference here. I got the impression they are making money trashing appraisers.
Edd “In the real estate economy, there are no guarantees that reason will prevail in a market where emotions run high and the amount of misinformation runs deep.” Jonathan Miller in The Matrix. So what’s an appraiser to do?
Edd Gillespie
Certified General
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:23 pm

Agree Annemieke . . .

Postby Jan Roseberry on Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:13 am

To make it worse it is my understanding that appraiser does not even know which appraisal is being targeted.
Watch your back and watch who's watching your back.
Jan Roseberry
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:44 pm
Location: Dover, OH


Return to Suspensions and Revocations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests