Appraisers' Free Forum

Bite me, Spell Boy ................[/quote]


I love it when you talk dirty, now if we could just get rid of GP...



TC

TC wrote:[font=Tahoma]If you can't appraise, review. [/font]

Okay, TC. Here's my question about your attitude. How do we fix and continue to monitor our profession if we don't review? And I include reviewing the reviewer in that category.

Goodpasture wrote: (I assume you meant "their"....just be glad you didn't type in all caps........)

Why...whatever do you mean

Goodpasture wrote: Did you mean "bull shit" tolerance?

Hey!...you can say that here!...

willie wrote:Rex, after reading the above, for some reason, the following medical condition came to mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropenis

Suddenly I'm feeling A LOT better about myself (gotta show that to the wife!).

tc wrote:I can top that, I had a FHA bozo give me lowest rating possible because he found a better sale next door to the subject. Too bad it was listed and sold 1 month after I inspected the property. Frickin' moron. Then backpedaled and claimed the bad rating was for other factors. Luckily he was really old and died soon thereafter.

TC

What a &*@!ing idiot (not sure if you can say that here).

TC wrote:Luckily he was really old and died soon thereafter.

So...just how mad were you at him anyway?

TC's still mad that home town Nationwide wouldn't hire him for a review job.

Mako wrote:[TC

What a &*@!ing idiot (not sure if you can say that here).

TC wrote:Luckily he was really old and died soon thereafter.

So...just how mad where you at him anyway? [/quote]


Geez, just alot pissed off. Luckily, and I know this is sacrilege to some, my client went to bat for me and kicked major butt.

Again, who reviews the reviewers?

TC

benluby wrote:

TC wrote:[font=Tahoma]If you can't appraise, review. [/font]

Okay, TC. Here's my question about your attitude. How do we fix and continue to monitor our profession if we don't review? And I include reviewing the reviewer in that category.

First of all, this is a business, not a profession.

If everyone is taught how to appraise properly, we don't need no stinkin' reviewers.


Love,


TC

I gotta stop drinking so early in the afternoon.

tc wrote:First of all, this is a business, not a profession.

It use to be a profession...and then came licensing...followed by sweatshops...followed by AMC's...

TC wrote:

benluby wrote:

TC wrote:[font=Tahoma]If you can't appraise, review. [/font]

Okay, TC. Here's my question about your attitude. How do we fix and continue to monitor our profession if we don't review? And I include reviewing the reviewer in that category.

First of all, this is a business, not a profession.

If everyone is taught how to appraise properly, we don't need no stinkin' reviewers.


Love,


TC

Not an answer. It's an honest question, TC. I just want a real answer.

From the very beginning, teach appraisers that they are disinterested third parties, and as such, should not be influenced by lenders.

TC

TC wrote:From the very beginning, teach appraisers that they are disinterested third parties, and as such, should not be influenced by lenders.

TC

That is how they teach the appraisers I know. Every person who has attended the schools gets that information. They also tell the police not to take bribes, and doctors not to take drugs, and other such warnings/cautions of trades/professions. They still have to police themselves, and reviewing is one of our methods of doing so.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need reviewers. Of course, in a perfect world, we wouldn't need appraisers or lenders, or credit checks, either.

Give it up Ben; TC is never going to admit how much he actually likes some reviewers. Bashing reviewers TC's brand of fun, much like the AI bashing that others do (you won't see him bashing AI, just reviewers).

Hugs and kisses coming to you TC

True enough. I'll refrain from commenting on the AI until I get more data.

benluby wrote:True enough. I'll refrain from commenting on the AI until I get more data.

Is that a new requirement on this forum? I was under the impression all that is needed to participate is an opinion.

Edd Gillespie wrote:

benluby wrote:True enough. I'll refrain from commenting on the AI until I get more data.

Is that a new requirement on this forum? I was under the impression all that is needed to participate is an opinion.

Only in your case!!! Some of us like to have facts to back up an opinion.

Just Kiddin' Counselor

benluby wrote:That is how they teach the appraisers I know. Every person who has attended the schools gets that information.

So, how did it happen that you took it seriously? There is a lot of evidence that suggests the conslusion that al levels these prohibitions are given lip service and the real message is, don't get caught catering to the lender's need for value.