Welcome
Welcome to Appraisers' Free Forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!

This is what it stated.....

Post it here if it won't fit anywhere else

Moderators: Otis, DB

Postby Steve Owen on Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:40 am

Otis wrote:Well, first off, Fannie Mae "guidelines" don't apply to vacant land appraisals since Fannie doesn't loan on vacant land.


One more short comment. This is certainly true. However, in my practice, I have generally considered these guidelines no matter what I am appraising. The reason: they make sense. Now, that being said, it is not at all unusual to see things well in excess of the guidelines, especially when appraising land. I don't mention the guidelines or refer to Fannie on such an appraisal, but it is always in the back of my mind that the further you are from those marks, the less reliable your conclusion may be.
I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
Steve Owen
Certified General
 
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Joplin, Missouri

Postby Otis on Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:24 pm

I know Steve and I don't disagree with you. It was just the way it was worded in the OP. There probably should have been a further clarification by the writer of the report, IMHO.
Don't believe everything you think ;)

What are they SMOKING?
<<Link
User avatar
Otis
Certified Residential
 
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:23 am
Location: High and Dry

Postby Jay Trotta on Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:28 pm

Bill C noted

In the addenduum this is what it stated:

I did not attempt to make any adjustments as they would be more than the normal 10% single, 15% net, and 25% gross


I am still scratching my head, as I read this to say, yes there are differences in the properties, but the adjustments would be so large I am not going to make them and have to explain them.

"A complex project for the person" #1

The basis for "Lack of Adjustments" in his/her mind, are beyond the "Guideline" parameters and they do not know how to justify the adjustments #2

Because of his/her reliance on the "Guidelines" - they are afraid of the ramifications, no matter what the explanation #3


#4 - Just look at what has happened right here, without any "adjustments or explanation" :?:

Lets take this a step further; he/she has only 5 sales, a couple of years back I abscounded with some info regarding Land Sales and that a minimum of *15* should be used, close in proximity; similar in size; and within the municipality. This would at least offer a basis to start from, with an ample amount of data. Being Limited (5-sales) creates a dilema for the entire report, adjustments-explanations whatever. In some area's we work in, we do not have the luxury of similar sized lots, there are different drawing factors for appeal, and not everywhere do they offer city services. Land sales are truly funny pieces to work on.
As President Ford said, "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
Jay Trotta
Member
 
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Snowglobe

Postby Steve Owen on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:26 pm

Just FYI, in case anyone thought I was trying to defend this appraiser. I'm not, and from what I can see it looks like he should be spanked. I just wanted to raise one of the "fine" points.
I haven't a particle of confidence in a man who has no redeeming petty vices.
- Mark Twain, a Biography
Steve Owen
Certified General
 
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: Joplin, Missouri

Previous

Return to General Appraisal Matters

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests